Frontier Lens
Verified progress log · since 1 Jan 2020

Is progress speeding up? We count it the same way every day.

Frontier Lens reads the same five public lists every day and logs each new advance that has a primary source. The lists never change, so this year compares fairly with 2020.

Verified advances per year…

Loading…

Loading the latest data…

Advances per month

Loading…

Latest verified

Full log →
  • Loading…

Statistics

Every verified approval, peer-reviewed result, measured record and checkable release since January 2020, counted the same way every day. Pick a field to focus every chart below.

Verified items over time

Proven: approvals, peer-reviewed results, measured recordsOfficial: first-party releases you can checkTrendFaded bars: not every day in that period was checked
Whole record · drag across it to zoom, click a bar above to see its stories
Show these numbers as a table

By field for the range above · click one to focus every chart on it

Stories · click a bar above, or open to browse

    Long-running measures official counts back to 2012 · click a chart to enlarge

    Year on year by field

    How items get in
    • Proven: a regulator’s decision, a peer-reviewed paper, a record certified by the body that keeps it, or an independently replicated result. The primary source is opened, not just a news story about it.
    • Official: a first-party release with something checkable: a model card, public API or weights, code, a product people can use, or a dated official announcement with specifics.
    • Left out: rumours, leaks, teasers, plans, funding rounds and partnerships with no result, and single-outlet claims.
    • Trend line: a least-squares fit to the fully checked periods in view: a curve when most periods are checked (curving up means the rate is rising), or a steady-growth line with a yearly rate when there are gaps.
    • One method, every day: every story here was found by items found by a full-depth sweep of five fixed lists, reading every day of each: FDA novel approvals, the labs’ model release pages and weekly AI recaps, Wikipedia’s science and spaceflight timelines, Simon Willison’s blog and the Hacker News front page. Every day from January 2020 has been read this way, and new days are read the same way, so a busier month means more happened, not that we looked harder. Items from a broader search used briefly in 2026 are kept out for the same reason.

    Tech tree

    An interactive map of technology: what has been proven, what is moving now, what comes next, and what each step is still waiting on.

    Progress counts only checkable evidence. Dates right of “Today” are forecasts; choose whose in Dates.

    Achieved Emerging Forecast
    Scroll to zoom · drag to move · click a technology for details
    About forecasters

    Pick whose dates the map shows from the Dates menu; each person’s panel entry links to where they said it, and a node’s panel lists everyone’s prediction side by side. Ray Kurzweil graded his own record at 86% correct (2010); independent volunteer grading found about 42% true or weakly true for 2009 (LessWrong, 2013) and roughly 24% for 2019 (LessWrong, 2020). Bottleneck sources are linked beside each item; unlinked items are the map’s own judgement. Metaculus figures were read from search results in October 2026 and may have moved since. Tractability is scored 1–5: 5 means a clear engineering path that is well funded, 1 means it still needs unknown science.